On Nov 6, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com> wrote:
On Nov 5, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Miserere wrote:
On 5 November 2010 12:29, Jaume Lahuerta <jlah...@yahoo.com> wrote:
wrong link last one
Woops! Let's try again:
http://tinyurl.com/2vy7qjv
What I find amazing is how the Kx seems to outperform the Kr. And
at high ISO even outperforms the K5 in dynamic range.
If you lose a stop of dynamic range and a stop of SNR for every
stop of ISO, why not just shoot at the base ISO and underexpose?
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
One reason I don't put all that much stock in DxO's tests is the
variance in performance of cameras with known-identical imaging
chains.
Although the Kx and Kr results are very close. I figured it was just
normal margin of error for their testing, and it would seem to be a
reasonable margin of error.
Paul
-Adam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
