On Nov 5, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote: > STOP IT! I DON'T NEED A K-5! >
Unless you have use of high ISO, autofocus and accurate metering. I am very curious about how the performance compares with the K-x. My guess is that the noise is a stop or two better at 1600 or above, and that it looks significantly better between 400 and 1600. I am also very curious about night landscape photography using it, showing stars. The last test I did (using LR2) still showed my best results using the K20 at ISO 400. I haven't gone back and tried reprocessing those with LR3 and better noise reduction, but that ISO range seems to be the K-x weak spot. Higher ISO are just too noisy for starry sky photography. -- Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
