Thanks Dave. I shot comparable pictures with the K-r & the K-5, and the only
differences (which put the K-5 one step above the K-r) you can spot are @
12800-25600. Below that, the pictures from the two cameras are practically
indistinguishable.
However, that K-r bought by my friend cannot focus beyond a few meters the
DA-L 18-55mm @ 18mm or other wide settings. The AF indicator says it's Ok
and lets you shoot, but the picture comes focused just a few meters instead
of say 10m, 100m or infinity.
When you use longer focal lengths, everything goes smooth. So my friend has
to focus the 18-55mm @ 55mm and then turn the zoom ring down to 18mm or the
like. Looks like a coal age procedure.
Dario
Love this shot.
The blue is so rich., and the detail is great.
I am now 51%K-r
49% D300s.
So its your fault if i buy one and Liz finds out.
Dave
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Dario Bonazza
<dario.bona...@virgilio.it> wrote:
I find this picture quite fascinating in more than one way:
www.dariobonazza.com/public/K5_00898_1.jpg
K-5, ISO 12800, 1/200s f/4, Sigma 17-70mm @70mm f/4 (full aperture)
focused
on the guitar.
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
