It was certainly the best possible outcome. But the British government's mindless funding of any citizen who wants to take legal action is indefensible. And having to compete with the UK s financial resources makes it less than a bargain. Paul On Dec 10, 2010, at 7:08 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> I know you agree that you got a real bargain and certainly the best possible > outcome. > > Jack > > --- On Fri, 12/10/10, paul stenquist <pnstenqu...@comcast.net> wrote: > >> From: paul stenquist <pnstenqu...@comcast.net> >> Subject: Re: I Wish >> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> >> Date: Friday, December 10, 2010, 3:37 PM >> I could have had six 645Ds for what >> it cost me to save Grace from her drunken wife-beating >> father and the British legal aid idiocy. >> Paul >> >> On Dec 10, 2010, at 6:34 PM, John Francis wrote: >> >>> >>> Well, if we're going to one-up each other: >>> >>> I could have got four 645Ds (with lenses) fow what we >> spent >>> on the kitchen remodel. Then there was a problem with >> the >>> heating which meant it was time to do the re-ducting >> that >>> we'd been putting off for years, and a small number of >> old >>> windows to be replaced before the tax credit ran out. >> That >>> would have covered a couple of K-5s with grips & >> DA* zooms. >>> >>> This would have been a bit less of an issue if my wife >> hadn't >>> been rather unexpectedly laid off from the job she's >> had for >>> the last 12 years (the day after we'd bought her the >> E-PL1). >>> No cause for panic, but it does mean discretionary >> spending >>> doesn't run to four-figure toys at the moment. >>> >>> >>> . >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 04:56:02PM -0600, Paul >> Sorenson wrote: >>>> I feel your pain. Some time before the end >> of the year we're >>>> supposed to be getting new windows. That's >> *four* K-5s that could >>>> have been under the tree. :-( >>>> >>>> -p >>>> >>>> On 12/10/2010 1:51 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: >>>>> Good gawd, man! How much more evidence of pure >> studliness do you >>>>> need? The K-5 is near-perfect and everyone >> should have one. Put >>>>> the reviews down and get out your wallet. >>>>> >>>>> The only reason there won't be one under my >> Xmas tree this year is >>>>> that "we" are getting a new floor for the >> house. I could have >>>>> bought a 645D for what that's setting us >> back. >>>>> >>>>> -bmw >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 10-12-10 12:11 PM, Jack Davis wrote: >>>>>> Not in the K20 manual.;) I hope to be >> reading the K-5 manual in >>>>>> not too long. >>>>>> Awaiting a couple more reviews and >> additional feed back from the PDML. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jack >>>>>> >>>>>> --- On Fri, 12/10/10, Steven >> Desjardins<drd1...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> From: Steven Desjardins<drd1...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: I Wish >>>>>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"<pdml@pdml.net> >>>>>>> Date: Friday, December 10, 2010, 9:08 >> AM >>>>>>> Isn't there a custom setting for >>>>>>> something like that? >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the >> link directly above and follow the directions. >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link >> directly above and follow the directions. >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link >> directly above and follow the directions. >> > > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
