On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 06:39:57PM -0500, Cory Waters wrote: > Thinking about surprising Santa this year and stuffing my own stocking. > I'd likely use the lens for youth soccer (futball), nature, and auto > racing shots. > I know the 2.8 would be nice (faster is ALWAYS better, right?) > The Pentax lens has a bit more reach in either direction. My > current lens for shooting these soccer games is the DA 50-200. I > get decent shots but but they mostly need cropping. The extra 50mm > would be nice and I'd be moving from 5.6 to F4 so that's better. > The Pentax would have better integration with my K10 and future bodies. > Do any of the 3rd party lenses work with the supersonic focus motor? > > The Pentax lens is more than a little bit more money though... > > What to do? > > Cory
One advantage of an 80-200/2.8 is that you can use it with a 1.4xTC to get extra reach (even more than the 60-250) at f/4. That being said, though, I've been considering getting a 60-250 myself, because it's more convenient not to have to use a TC. But for now I'll have to carry on making do with the 80-200. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.