On Jan 1, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Jens wrote: > I'm not sure Paul, but since it a studio recording done at appr. the same > time, I guess it the same aperture - F 13 or perhaps F11. > > Next time I shall: > > 1. Make sure the conditions are very close to being exactly the same. > 2. Use new 120 film (Kodak Ektar 100 or Fuji Astia 100) > 3. Use a pro-lab for developing > 4. Unfortunalely I don't have a por scanner, but I will use my Epson > Perfection 3200 Photo, which does deliver reasonably good scans.
I scanned on of my 6s7 shots on my 3200 and was reasonably pleased with the results. Then, just for grins, a friend of mine scanned the same transparency on his Imacon film scanner. The difference in sharpness and detail resolution was considerable. No comparison. A flatbed scan works with medium format, but it's far from optimum. Paul > > I may compare the F4 165 mm LS lens to a reasonably sharp 50mm lens for the > K-7. > I must say I am surprised how sharp the 2.8 28-70mm zoom lens is. It actually > beat quite a few primes :-) > > Jens > -- > Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself. > > On Jan 1, 2011 20:13 "paul stenquist" <pnstenqu...@comcast.net> wrote: >> I'm surprised the K7 pic is as sharp as it is, given that it was shot >> at f13, where you're going to get a lot of diffusion. Try it at f5.6 >> or so. What stop did you shoot the 6x7 pic at. And what lens. You list >> an 80/2.8. I assume you mean the 90/2.8? >> Paul >> On Jan 1, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Jens wrote: >> >>> Thank you all for you rinterest in responding and answering my >>> question. >>> I have done some samll tests, that didin't turn out too well. But I >>> was using old film and a questionable lab for developing. >>> My result is shown at flickr. >>> I photographed a sitting girl (in full figure) filling out the frame >>> with my K-7 and with my 67. I enlarged one eye to be able to >>> evaluate the resolution and sharpness: >>> K-7: >>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/5204650099/in/set-721576254614341 >>> 40/ >>> 67: >>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/5204621235/in/set-721576254614341 >>> 40/ >>> >>> In my small, not too well done ,test it seems that the K-7 is doing >>> rather well. >>> In order to convince myself, that I should keep on using the 67 >>> (insted of selling it) I need results that show, that the 67 >>> delivers reslults that are superior to those of the K-7. >>> >>> Regards >>> Jens >>> -- >>> Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >>> and follow the directions. >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
