2011/1/18 Elizabeth Masoner <lizmaso...@bellsouth.net>: > > There are some exceptions based on photos taken in public places and at > public events. However, these are poorly defined in the law and judges are > notoriously inconsistent on rulings. Most judges take the side of the > person photographed without permission, although there have been a few > notable cases where judges sided with the photographer. One case that was > on the side of the "photographer" actually damaged the image of > photographers in the US. The judge ruled that it was ok for a man to use a > cell photo to secretly take upskirt photos of women in a mall because the > mall was a public place. I haven't heard yet about the appeal but I hope > this one is overturned because it has drastic ramifications for privacy > expectations for all of us.
Wow, that ones hurts badly :( -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs ---------------------- Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45, DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ ... Laptop: Macbook 13" Unibody SnowLeo/Win7 Programing: Delphi 2009 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
