What you say makes sense, but there is a major problem with such an
approach, as I see it, personally.
Consider that you made a photo of yourself on backdrop of Trafalgar
square and you want to publish it in your blog basically just to boast
that you were there and how good you looked. Now, if what you say
applies, you /cannot/ publish it, unless you /obtained specific permit/
from /all/ people on the square that basically faced your camera and
weren't too far away from it or yourself.
Innocent unless proven guilty, not the other way around.
On 1/18/2011 2:51 PM, Thibouille wrote:
Don't think so.
If it is published, you need autorization IMO.
2011/1/18 Boris Liberman<bori...@gmail.com>:
On 1/18/2011 2:12 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
"It is the sole responsibility of the submitting photographer to obtain
a written release
from any _recognizable_ [emphasis mine] person in a submitted photo."
Don't you have a rule/law in your country whereas if you take a picture of a
person in public and don't use it for profit/publicity/etc then you /don't
need/ to have a written release therefrom?
I've a pic in there that shows faces... No problems this far.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
