That is a bargain. Even for a non-working one. Ciao, Graywolf ----------------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message ----- From: gfen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 1:34 PM Subject: Re: Medium format? Large format? What? > On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Robert Harris wrote: > > attractive. In photography, as in many other things best not mentioned, > > size matters. > > No comment. > > > But to get larger negatives requires that the bodies and lenses get > > larger and heavier -- and the larger you want the negative, the larger > > and heavier is the gear you need. Hence the term "bloated" for the > > Pentax 67. :) > > Actually, I was just offered his Speed Graphic (I'm still unsure on teh > model, it looks to be a pacemaker) with a pair of lenses (I'm also unsure > of the focal length, the one on the unit doesn't have anything printed > on it), plus a series of film sheet holders for $70. > > Outside of some scuffing on the leather, I think I'm going to take him up > on it just on the sheer fact that its a very pretty novelty, and seems to > be a piece of photographic history. > > -- > http://www.infotainment.org > "The destructive character is cheerful." - Walter Benjamin > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
