On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 03:41:38PM +1000, Brian Walters wrote: > On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 23:38 -0500, "Christine Aguila" > <cagu...@earthlink.net> wrote: > > No, not really interested in that. Cheers, Christine > > > > > Well, I would be. Or, at least I think I would be. > > I've only briefly played with the original EP-1 and I liked it a lot. I > might have a totally different opinion once I've looked at a mirrorless > camera seriously, though....
I must admit that I definitely like the convenience and portability of the E-PL1 (nominally my wife's camera ...) http://www.jfwaf.com/PAW/PAW.php?name=PAW1031 Something about that size that would take my Pentax glass (without losing any functionality) would certainly make me take a look at it. It might not make a lot of sense on the back of telephoto lenses; as another poster has mentioned, the balance of a DSLR on long glass is much improved by the addition of a battery grip. But I don't use long glass all the time, and a smaller, lighter body would be handy. I'm not too bothered about the format - either APS-C or 4/3. > > > From: "Steven Desjardins" <drd1...@gmail.com> > > > > Mirrorless with K-5 sensor? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.