On Apr 17, 2011, at 7:56 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:

> Mirrorless with K-5 sensor?

I'll pass on that.

> 
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Christine  Aguila
> <cagu...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> Not really sure if it would save money, but maybe it would--or not :-).  I'd
>> want the weather sealing, Steve!  Cheers, Christine
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven Desjardins" <drd1...@gmail.com>
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
>> Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2011 6:48 PM
>> Subject: Re: What next in an SLR?
>> 
>> 
>> Would leaving any of that out really save any money?  Isn't most of
>> that already on the chip or mostly firmware?  Maybe a KX style plastic
>> body with no weather sealing.
>> 
>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Christine  Aguila
>> <cagu...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 1) Pentax still needs to improve on low-light autofocus--that's a must.
>>> 
>>> 2) But, here's what I'd like to see: a stripped down camera.
>>> K-5 high ISO quality , frames per second, bracketing feature, natural
>>> shooting mode only, & AV, TV et al. modes, white balance features--then
>>> add
>>> improved lowlight autofocus.
>>> 
>>> Get rid of everything else--video, creative filters, multiple exposure
>>> shooting, etc. I think a stripped down camera would make a nice back-up
>>> camera or primary camera for that matter. It would have the quality of the
>>> K5 but hopefully at a lower cost. One could use the fancy features on the
>>> K5 if needed.
>>> 
>>> Probably sounds crazy, but I thought I'd throw my 2 cents in. :-) Cheers,
>>> Christine
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Bray" <tb...@textuality.com>
>>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
>>> Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2011 11:50 AM
>>> Subject: What next in an SLR?
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> I'm awfully happy with the K-5. (I was out last night trying to take
>>>> flash-free pictures in the light of the full moon using my old Sigma
>>>> 30mm f1.4; it didn't come off for one reason or another, but I haven't
>>>> given up). Anyhow, it can shoot in as little light as I'll ever need,
>>>> and as many frames-per-second as I'll ever need, with as many pixels
>>>> as I'll ever need, and has a battery as big as I'll ever need, and so
>>>> on and so on.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm thinking if I were a Pentax product manager trying to figure out
>>>> what to put in the K-3 or K-1... I just wouldn't know where to start.
>>>> 
>>>> Smaller would be nice but you can only take that so far before the
>>>> K-glass gets way out of balance with the body; the K-5 looks
>>>> deliciously butch with the short extra-fat Sigma on.
>>>> 
>>>> Once again, what should Pentax be working on? -T
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>>> follow the directions.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> PDML@pdml.net
>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>>> follow the directions.
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Steve Desjardins
>> 
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>> follow the directions.
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
>> follow the directions.
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Steve Desjardins
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to