On Apr 18, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote: > The only way they would do that would be if they used a EVF and you > could look that way. No digital camera is going to sell without a way > to chimp. I have wondered why they don't leave it off an EVIL, > however, and just have a really good evf.
Because using menus to reconfigure the camera would be a real PiTA through an EVF. > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 2:09 PM, steve harley <p...@paper-ape.com> wrote: >> On 2011-04-18 11:33 , P. J. Alling wrote: >>> >>> Maybe if they just got the thickness of the camera body >>> down to being only slightly greater than the LX >> >> one way to do that would be to remove the display >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > > > > -- > Steve Desjardins > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
