Yeah but he gets a tad snippy if you MARK one that is too obviously something he would quote , something that is so obviously a gem. So then MARKing becomes a more subtle art.
MARK! On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Ann Sanfedele <ann...@nyc.rr.com> wrote: > Yeah but he gets a tad snippy if you MARK one that is too obviously > something he would quote , something that is so obviously a > gem. So then MARKing becomes a more subtle art. > > ann > > Stan Halpin wrote: > >> Mark Roberts started collecting "interesting" snippets from PDML messages. >> Often items that may have made sense originally but sound a bit off when >> pulled out of context. Then he started publishing his collection on his web >> site at the end of each year. Then he included the collection as part of the >> PDML Annual Photobook. >> >> When list members spot what they think is a candidate for inclusion inThe >> List, and recognizing that Mark may not read every message, they submit >> their nomination by annotating a quote of the relevant passage with MARK. >> Which may or may not trigger a filter Mark may or may not have set on his >> email reader. >> >> stan >> >> On Apr 20, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote: >> >> >>> >>> Some new terminology has been coined. >>> What's with this "MARK" language? >>> I need some context. >>> >>> Sincerely, >>> Collin Brendemuehl http://kerygmainstitute.org >>> "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose" >>> -- Jim Elliott >>> >> >> >> > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
