On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:36 -0400, "Steven Desjardins" <drd1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah but he gets a tad snippy if you MARK one that is too obviously > something he would quote , something that is so obviously a > gem. So then MARKing becomes a more subtle art. > > MARK!
Speaking of which, would it not be more efficient to 'MARK' the subject line rather than burying 'MARK' within the body of a message that Mark may or may not read? BTW, an explanation of MARK (not Mark) can be found in the PDML FAQ: http://pug.komkon.org/general/mini-faq.html Cheers Brian ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Ann Sanfedele <ann...@nyc.rr.com> > wrote: > > Yeah but he gets a tad snippy if you MARK one that is too obviously > > something he would quote , something that is so obviously a > > gem. So then MARKing becomes a more subtle art. > > > > ann > > > > Stan Halpin wrote: > > > >> Mark Roberts started collecting "interesting" snippets from PDML messages. > >> Often items that may have made sense originally but sound a bit off when > >> pulled out of context. Then he started publishing his collection on his web > >> site at the end of each year. Then he included the collection as part of > >> the > >> PDML Annual Photobook. > >> > >> When list members spot what they think is a candidate for inclusion inThe > >> List, and recognizing that Mark may not read every message, they submit > >> their nomination by annotating a quote of the relevant passage with MARK. > >> Which may or may not trigger a filter Mark may or may not have set on his > >> email reader. > >> > >> stan > >> > >> On Apr 20, 2011, at 9:59 AM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote: > >> > >> > >>> > >>> Some new terminology has been coined. > >>> What's with this "MARK" language? > >>> I need some context. > >>> > >>> Sincerely, > >>> Collin Brendemuehl http://kerygmainstitute.org > >>> "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose" > >>> -- Jim Elliott > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > > follow the directions. > > > > > > -- > Steve Desjardins > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to stop worrying and love email again -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
