That response is encouraging. Certainly hope it gets results, Ken. Jack
--- On Sun, 6/12/11, Ken Waller <kwal...@peoplepc.com> wrote: > From: Ken Waller <kwal...@peoplepc.com> > Subject: Re: PPG > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> > Date: Sunday, June 12, 2011, 5:55 PM > > Good luck trying to get their > attention. Seems to be nearly impossible. > > I contacted the PPG 3 days ago and received a reply in less > than 3 hours. They needed further info they would forward to > their web agency. > > Kenneth Waller > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stenquist" <pnstenqu...@comcast.net> > Subject: Re: PPG > > > > > > On Jun 12, 2011, at 8:41 PM, Ken Waller wrote: > > > >> Currently trying to clear up an issue on my > gallery in the PPG - seems one of my earliest images has > been replaced by someone else's shot. My title for the image > is the same but my image is gone. It was one accepted into > the collection and on the collection gallery it remains as > titled. > >> > > > > Good luck trying to get their attention. Seems to be > nearly impossible. > > Paul > > > >> Kenneth Waller > >> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller > >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel J. > Matyola" <danmaty...@gmail.com> > >> > >> Subject: Re: PPG > >> > >> > >>> About a month ago, the PPG was handling > submissions quickly. I was > >>> down to one submission, which was relatively > new. That submission > >>> remained "under review" for almost a month > after the others submitted > >>> at the same time were accepted or rejected, > then it was finally > >>> rejected. Now, it is back to the older, > slower pace of review. > >>> > >>> I have had a few instances of images I really > liked being rejected. > >>> Some have been accepted after re-submission. > >>> > >>> Dan > >>> > >>> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Ann > Sanfedele <ann...@nyc.rr.com> > wrote: > >>>> David J Brooks wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> So after what seemed like 2 years of > PPG ignoring, i posted 5 tulip > >>>>> photos for review last month. The two > that were well received here, > >>>>> failed to get in, but the other two i > send as fillers are now in. Go > >>>>> figure. > >>>>> > >>>>> So with that in mind i have started to > send in my birds in flight photos. > >>>>> > >>>>> Dave > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Yeah I just had some weirdness there... I > haven't submitted much because I > >>>> went 5 years without shooting Pentax... so > I > >>>> have to dig out oldies... > >>>> > >>>> anyway -- the Red flamingo shot that I > favor a lot of mine was rejected > >>>> about a month ago... I resubmitted it just > a couple of > >>>> days ago and it suddenly got in... > >>>> > >>>> The speed at which it got in made me think > it was simply a matter of so many > >>>> more people having time to vote - > especially those who like birds and > >>>> flowers > >>>> > >>>> ann > > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
