What verbal adjective begins with f, is frequently not written out by replacing it's letters by placeholders, and is often used by passionate people like our friend Bill?
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu...@comcast.net> wrote: > > On Sep 27, 2011, at 8:25 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: > >> "That would be the f-- message?" >> >> Seriously Bill, at first i thought you were just cussing. > > > Huh??? >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu...@comcast.net> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:07 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: >>> >>>> On 11-09-27 5:38 PM, John Sessoms wrote: >>>>> From: Larry Colen >>>>>> I just ran across my photos from burning man a year ago where I >>>>>> hadn't realized that my freshly repaired K20 had been reset to the >>>>>> factory default of "shoot jpeg". If I cared so little about my >>>>>> photos that I wanted to shoot JPEGs, I wouldn't spend the money on a >>>>>> DSLR. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If you get the exposure (and white balance, and ...) correct in camera >>>>> JPEG is all you need. >>>> >>>> The best film-days analogy I have is that shooting straight to JPEG is >>>> like shooting Polaroids, and shooting RAW is like shooting negatives. The >>>> Polaroid gives you the convenience of straight to finished picture, at the >>>> expense of doing any darkroom work. >>>> >>>> Everyone shoots differently and decides what convenience level they prefer >>>> and what they'll give up for it. For me, the RAW image I get in the camera >>>> is just the beginning of the journey to a finished image. I don't publicly >>>> display a single image, not one, that I can say is Straight Out Of Camera. >>>> I have lots of images that I've never edited, but it's because they >>>> haven't been flagged as keepers for further work. >>>> >>>> -bmw >>> >>> I agree with Bruce. Although I might compare shooting jpegs to shooting >>> transparency film, while shooting RAW is more like shooting negative film. >>> However, RAW conversion gives you many more options for image improvement >>> than does printing a negative. For example, you can set the white point and >>> black point to suite the image perfectly, and you can adjust contrast and >>> brightness in the midrange without changing those end point values. You can >>> fill shadow areas with a bit of light while leaving the rest of the image >>> virtually untouched. You can fine tune your saturation and white point. And >>> more. The only time I shoot jpegs is when I have to produce 500 frames for >>> virtual tours. But for anything else, it's RAW. I'd be lost without the >>> control that RAW affords. >>> Paul >>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>>> follow the directions. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Steve Desjardins >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
