We're a very polite people (with the exception of Bill Robb).

;-)

(just kidding, Bill)

cheers,
frank 

--- Original Message ---

From: "P. J. Alling" <webstertwenty...@gmail.com>
Sent: November 28, 2011 11/28/11
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
Subject: Re: Giving and taking criticism

Stop being agreeable, but then I guess you can't help it, you're Canadian.

On 11/28/2011 2:00 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
> I agree with Ann.
>
> Cheers,
> frank
>
> --- Original Message ---
>
> From: Ann Sanfedele<ann...@nyc.rr.com>
> Sent: November 28, 2011 11/28/11
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"<pdml@pdml.net>
> Subject: Re: Giving and taking criticism
>
> Well put, Tom..
> Nice summing up of the whole bit
>
> ann
>
> On 11/28/2011 13:21, Tom C wrote:
>> Been out and about at Bryce and Zion National Parks over the weekend.
>> I may have one or two shots to display. :-)
>>
>> Here's my thoughts on this semi-annual topic:
>>
>> 1. If a person posts a picture they're inviting a response. Usually
>> they're expecting a positive response I believe, otherwise they likely
>> wouldn't have posted it.
>> 2. Having invited a response a poster must be prepared for a response
>> they did not expect, i.e., negative feedback or tips for improvement.
>> 3. There's nothing wrong with posting an image and getting an "ego
>> massage" out of it, especially if it's a praiseworthy image. We all
>> like to feel good about our photography.
>>
>> That being said:
>>
>> 4. Many images are offered for viewing that were intended more as a
>> show&   tell and sharing, a form of communication as opposed to an
>> example of photographic craft.
>> 5. It seems kudos are often given for these images and they often
>> receive the same adulation as images that meet a higher standard.
>> That's unfortunate because it, in essence lumps great shots and
>> otherwise into the same bucket. It's akin to pooling tips for
>> waiters/waitresses. Excellent service and poor service are rewarded
>> equally. That can have the tendency to make some with mediocre shots
>> believe they have a great image and it tends to have a diluting effect
>> on praise given to worthy images, especially if the same person is
>> giving the feedback.
>> 6. For criticism and critique to have validity one must take into
>> account the credentials of the one giving feedback, be it here, or any
>> of the numerous photo sharing sites. But credentials alone is not the
>> end all, because personal subjectivity always enters in. I've found on
>> other sites, that it appears some individuals have the tendency to
>> downgrade others images as a means to inflate their own egos.
>> Likewise, a beginner in photography can easily get excited about an
>> image that has little merit - or not realizing how little they know,
>> give negative feedback and advice.
>> 7. A negative critique that attacks the photographer as opposed to the
>> photograph serves no use. It's that kind of negative attack I've seen
>> from time to time on the list, that I find onerous whether it occurs
>> to myself or someone else. It's pointless, rude, and serves no purpose
>> other than to elevate the one giving the critique - in their own mind.
>>
>> Personally:
>>
>> 7. I generally give only positive feedback and feel that praising the
>> positive is the best way of promoting improvement and continued
>> excellence. The photographer can learn the basics from a book and with
>> practice, so I feel no need to give instruction.
>> 8. Take a 'no comment' as either negative feedback or lack of interest
>> on my part. If not that, then it means I was simply too busy too look
>> or respond.
>>
>> Tom C.
>>


-- 
Don't lose heart!  They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a 
lengthily search.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to