On Jan 21, 2012, at 7:16 AM, Christine Nielsen wrote: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Christine Aguila <christ...@caguila.com> > wrote: > I can't stand the way the 16-50mm DA* ejaculates ; it's so vulgar, > though I do recognize it takes nice pictures. It's so different than > the DA* 50-135mm, which maintains its lovely shape as you zoom in and > out. > > Somehow, I didn't realize this was a "feature" of the 16-50... having > the refined 50-135, it never occurred to me that its sibling would be > so crude. And I've been saving for the 16-50 as my next acquisition. > This revelation is enough to make me reconsider. Ick.
And people wonder why I like to be the one behind the camera. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
