It makes sense to go mirrorless for the low end, where cost really matters. That doesn't mean there won't be a K5 replacement.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 1:15 PM, P. J. Alling <webstertwenty...@gmail.com> wrote: > It was 2006 everything was but ugly. > > > On 1/20/2012 8:39 PM, Christine Aguila wrote: >> >> Well, I think that's a butt ugly camera. Cheers, Christine :-) >> >> >> >> On Jan 20, 2012, at 7:08 PM, Steven Desjardins<drd1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> You have to do better than that, Christine. To which depressing thing >>> are you referring? ;-) >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Christine Aguila<christ...@caguila.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Well that's depressing. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jan 20, 2012, at 4:44 PM, Steven Desjardins<drd1...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Let's hope for this one: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.mirrorlessrumors.com/i-hope-marc-newson-can-make-a-better-pentax-k-design-than-that-one/ >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Christine >>>>> Aguila<christ...@caguila.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I guess I agree with Paul, but I have to say it would break my heart >>>>>> to see the K5 to go away with no upgrade to follow. I'd probably use my >>>>>> Pentax gear until I couldn't any more, then switch. Cheers, Christine >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 20, 2012, at 12:59 PM, Paul Stenquist<pnstenqu...@comcast.net> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:57 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Tom C wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Assuming I had a K-5, what would induce me to buy a mirrorless >>>>>>>>> system >>>>>>>>> that is essentially in all other respects, a K-5? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The K5 being discontinued? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If no DSLR upgrade were introduced, that would induce me to sell my >>>>>>> gear and go to Nikon. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Paul >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Mark Roberts - Photography& Multimedia >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> www.robertstech.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >>>>>>>> and follow the directions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >>>>>>> and follow the directions. >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>>>>> follow the directions. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Steve Desjardins >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>>>> follow the directions. >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>>> PDML@pdml.net >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>>> follow the directions. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Steve Desjardins >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >>> > > > -- > Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid > a lengthily search. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
