That applet is a great explanation of how phase detection AF works,
but I don't think it explains lens-to-lens variation in AF.

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:27 PM, George Sinos <gsi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, I found my answer, and some animated examples here.
> <http://graphics.stanford.edu/courses/cs178/applets/autofocusPD.html>
>
> The short story is that phase-detection measures the error and tells
> the lens which direction and how far to move to get into the correct
> position.  It's faster, but depends on everything being calibrated.
> Sort of like saying "go three feet to the east and you'll be there."
> If you both have accurate rulers and compasses it will work fine.
>
> The contrast detection method used with live view is iterative and
> keeps sending correction messages until the image is focused.  Slower,
> but more accurate.
>
> So it boils down to the fact that lens and body manufacturing
> tolerances are wide enough that, for phase-detect focus to be spot-on,
> each lens-body pair needs to be micro-calibrated.
>
> If you can live with the slower contrast-detection focusing of live
> view, it will probably be more accurate.
>
> Anyway, that sheds light on the old "my copy of this lens isn't
> focusing" statement.  It's more like "this copy of the lens on this
> copy of the body aren't a good match."
>
> Bottom line,  now I think I understand why the simple calibration
> method can work.
>
> gs
>
> George Sinos
> --------------------
> gsi...@gmail.com
> www.georgesphotos.net
> plus.georgesinos.com
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Bryan Jacoby <bryan.jac...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:32 PM, George Sinos <gsi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If that's true people should be saying this "camera body back-focuses
>>> with this lens" instead of the more commonly phrased "this lens has a
>>> back-focus problem."
>>
>> I can't say I understand exactly why this is, but phase detection AF
>> errors can apparently be caused by the body or the lens.
>>
>> I understand why a lens with spherical aberration could front/back
>> focus when used at an aperture setting that's not the same as what the
>> AF sensor is using (often f/5.6); I'm not sure if this would be
>> significant.  But there seems to be more to it than that: different
>> copies of the same lens apparently will focus differently on the same
>> body (see 
>> http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2008/12/this-lens-is-soft-and-other-myths).
>>
>> Aside from the optics, at least in some systems, maybe all, AF lenses
>> tell the camera body what the focus distance setting is.   This,
>> combined with the "how far out of focus is it" information from the AF
>> sensor, lets the camera body calculate how much to adjust the focus.
>> I would think that errors in this focus distance encoding would lead
>> to multiple iterations before locking on focus, but not errors in the
>> final locked focus point.
>>
>> Can anybody explain the origin of lens-related phase detection AF errors?
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to