It's hard to tell from an image on Facebook. I'd want to see it larger and before it's been overly compressed. I know from my own shots that skin with lots of real detail can become plastic-y looking at 960px and high JPEG compression.
Then there's context. If this is intended for a fashion spread, highly smoothed skin (but still with texture) is expected. If it's supposed to be a portrait, I'd expect more reality. On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Dario Bonazza <dario.bona...@virgilio.it> wrote: > > The photographer got a lot of compliments for this picture. Am I the only > one thinking she looks more plasticky than a Barbie here? > > https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=4213904911356&set=oa.406600779386045&type=1&theater > Dario > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
