It's just an ad.Your over thinking things.

On 17 November 2012 07:48, Igor Roshchin <s...@komkon.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> I am surprised to see that somebody would be putting the only body
> without the lens attached in the bag as it is shown in the first
> video at, say 0:50, and then again at about 1:00.
> http://products.lowepro.com/product/Pro-Messenger-180-AW,2285,20.htm
> or directly at Vimeo:
> http://vimeo.com/29802717#
>
> While the narrator says that it is the second body, in those cases,
> it is clearly not the case. (Other footage where it is is
> intermixed with this though.)
>
> So, I was wondering if anybody would be carrying the only camera
> body in a messenger bag (when, presumably, you want to be able
> to take it out and use quickly) - separate from any lens.
> If yes, - what would be the reason why you'd do that?
>
> The only possible argument I can see is that it would be quicker
> to choose the lens (so that you don't need to detach what you
> have on first). I'd think that it'd be better to have something
> always attached, - at least you'd be more prepared for ~50% of
> shots (if you carry two lenses).
>
> What do you think?
>
> Igor
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to