I guess they have to illustrate that it can be done, that said I can only carry my #2 body in my pack sans lens, it's a bit of a pain but so is a bigger pack.
Cheers, On 17 November 2012 10:48, Igor Roshchin <s...@komkon.org> wrote: > > > I am surprised to see that somebody would be putting the only body > without the lens attached in the bag as it is shown in the first > video at, say 0:50, and then again at about 1:00. > http://products.lowepro.com/product/Pro-Messenger-180-AW,2285,20.htm > or directly at Vimeo: > http://vimeo.com/29802717# > > While the narrator says that it is the second body, in those cases, > it is clearly not the case. (Other footage where it is is > intermixed with this though.) > > So, I was wondering if anybody would be carrying the only camera > body in a messenger bag (when, presumably, you want to be able > to take it out and use quickly) - separate from any lens. > If yes, - what would be the reason why you'd do that? > > The only possible argument I can see is that it would be quicker > to choose the lens (so that you don't need to detach what you > have on first). I'd think that it'd be better to have something > always attached, - at least you'd be more prepared for ~50% of > shots (if you carry two lenses). > > What do you think? > > Igor > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
