Yes, the scanner is amazingly good. Better than I could have hoped for at that price or even twice as much.
On Feb 23, 2013, at 11:15 PM, Ann Sanfedele <ann...@nyc.rr.com> wrote: > > > On 2/23/2013 21:16, Paul Stenquist wrote: >> A shot of my race car on the jack and ready to be warmed in the pits. >> Notice how I didn't bother to close the doors on the car hauler behind it. >> But I was more into the racing than the photography back then. >> >> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16963159&size=lg >> >> Having a lot of fun scanning old transparencies with the new Epson 500V. >> Most of my Kodachromes are as good as new. They've been stored in plastic >> sleeves for the last twenty years. In the Kodak boxes for the preceding >> twenty or so years. >> >> Paul >> > > ah so you got it! .. great scanner isnt it? My Kodachromes from back then > are fine as well - lasted better than Agfacrhomes from the 60's. and the > ektachromes didn't always fare so well. My chromes are in boxes in metal > cabinets and some in archival sleeves. > > ann > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
