And of course there's much about digital that film can't reproduce. In the end, I take digital for my serious work, hands down. That said, Ive had a lot of fun with film this week. I have to break out my Speed Graphic some time soon.
Paul On Feb 24, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Zos Xavius <zosxav...@gmail.com> wrote: > Looking through these old film scans makes me want to get a MF film > camera even more. Heck a crown graphic would be a lot of fun too. :) > > There's something about film that digital can't reproduce. I can't > wait to try my first roll of velvia. :) > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Bill <anotherdrunken...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 23/02/2013 10:49 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: >>> >>> Bill, >>> I've seen the same here with my Dad's stuff. >> >> I think it's the E-2 and E-4 process films that are suffering the worst. E-6 >> was released in 1977, and seems to be quite a bit more stable. >> >> >> bill >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
