San Francisco recently passed a law that  prohibits nudity in the city 
(this was approved by voters). I think it was  appropriate (I forget where I 
read this or when, but googling should turn it up  -- probably last November). 

Encouraging alternative life styles is one  thing, but when children are 
going to be around, tourists, etc., well, there is  no reason to be blatantly 
offensive. So SF has clean up its act. 

Marnie  aka Doe :-)

In a message dated 4/6/2013 5:56:09 A.M. Pacific Daylight  Time, 
danmaty...@gmail.com writes:
Your reference to San Francisco is a good  case in point.  If you go to
the tourist areas, or the business areas,  of the city, you will not
see the kind of display that you witnessed. Like  many of our cities,
and many European cities, like Copenhagen or Amsterdam,  there are
areas where alternative life styles are not only tolerated,  but
actually encouraged.  If one doesn't want to see nudity, pot, or  other
sights that distress or offend you, one avoids those areas.  There  are
plenty of places in the US where pervasive wholesomeness is  almost
overwhelming.  


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to