On Wed, Apr 24, 2013, John Sessoms wrote: > From: Aahz Maruch >>On Wed, Apr 24, 2013, Darren Addy wrote: >>> >>>If you do any stock photography, agencies will pretty much not look at >>>anything these days if it has a recognizable person and no model >>>release. Fortunately, the old pen and paper days are behind us. Google >>>"model release app" to find one you can do with your smartphone or >>>tablet. >>> >>>However, if you are simply asking whether you can take photos of >>>people without having them sign a model release, the answer is "yes". >> >>My question was more about "should" and whether other people use model >>releases for vacation photos. As I said earlier, I really don't plan to >>use these photos commercially, but I've also seen plenty of posts here >>about revisiting old photos, so I figured I'd ask. > > You really only need a model release if the photo is going to be > used to sell a product. > > Under most *normal* circumstances you won't need a model release > even if you decide to sell prints of the photos.
Ahhh.... that hadn't registered. Thanks! -- Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/ <*> <*> <*> Help a hearing-impaired person: http://rule6.info/hearing.html -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
