That sort of stuff usually happens because a person's equipment isn't perfect. We all know that we have to test all of the films we shoot in order to determine what corrections our cameras require. We should know that the corrections necessary for one camera may not be the corrections needed for other cameras. Some folks just seem to think that whatever works for them should be the benchmark for everybody, and they are all too happy to share that information. It's not a bad thing to share the information, it's just that the receiver should be aware that his mileage may vary.
Len --- ----- Original Message ----- From: "tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 6:38 PM Subject: Re: Re: Any experience with Fuji NPC? > That, or they just think the film is overrated, and a bit more exposure is needed to get adequate shadow detail. > > tv > > On 28 Mar 2002 at 18:21, Len Paris wrote: > > > It's just "sage" advise given by someone who believes that their > > way of seeing is the only way to see. > > > > Len > > --- > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Frits J. Wüthrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > > > I am not sure if I understand this. You want a portrait film, > > which has a > > > low contrast, and by setting the ISO setting lower you > > increase the > > > contrast? Is this why this advise is given? I have read the > > same advise on > > > Portra 160NC. I am confused, please help me. What is the > > advantage? > > > > > > Frits Wüthrich > > - > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
