Stan -
I have both the Pentax AF-540 and the Metz 58 AF-2. Speaking from using
them with the K-X and the K-5:
The light output seems to be pretty close to the same
The Metz seems produce more consistent exposures.
Both can be run wirelessly.
Function changes can be more more quickly with the Pentax using
switches and dials. The Metz is more menu driven. Some users have
complained about the use of menus with the Metz.
The Metz has an adjustable secondary flash to use for fill when bouncing
the main flash.
The Metz firmware can be updated via USB connection to your computer.
The latest upgrade appears to address the K-5 II.
The Metz retains its function settings when it goes you turn it off, the
Pentax reverts to P-TTL.
-p
On 6/24/2013 9:40 AM, Stan Halpin wrote:
I don't use flash often, have never taken time to master the process. But I
have an upcoming project that provides the incentive to revisit this aspect of
my photography.
I have the Pentax AF360 FGZ that I bought long ago to pair with my MZ-S and
which I have used occasionally.
I am considering adding the AF540 FGZ. Two things holding me back at this point:
a. IIRC Pentax is coming out sometime soon with a replacement for the
AF540.
b. I have noted discussions here about Metz and other alternatives.
So, my questions:
a. Has anybody heard anything more about if/when and for how much we'll
have an AF540 replacement?
b1. If I go with Metz or other system, do I lose functionality on my
K-5ii? i.e., will I still have the same capability for wireless triggering, the
use of two-flash setups, etc?
b2. Other than cost, are there any advantages to the Metz or other
systems?
b3. Other than Pentax and Metz, which other alternative brands should I
look at for good, fully capable, reliable flash in the AF540 range?
Thanks!
stan
--
Being old doesn't seem so old now that I'm old.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
