It's a shame they went to an even noisier sensor. I haven't tried
shooting the V-Lux at anything over ISO 100 so far. At what point does
the noise start to really degrade the image?
I really do like the lens a lot. If I found an exceptional deal on a
gently used one of those Panasonic somewhere, I'd be sorely tempted to
buy it as a lightweight carry-around for snapshots.
-- Walt
On 6/27/2013 2:24 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
I had both a panasonic fz-28 and fz-35. I think the v-lux 1 is the
same as an fz-50. They all had great, great optics that more than made
up for the noisy sensors panny was using. When they switched from CCD
to MOS (which gave even worse quality) I quit buying them and bought
my first DSLR. I've made some really nice prints from those cameras.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Walt <ldott...@gmail.com> wrote:
My pal, Dan, loaned me his Leica V-Lux 1 for a couple of weeks just to kick
the tires on it a bit.
I have to say, for a point and shoot, I'm pretty impressed. The build
quality is no great shakes, and it definitely lacks the responsiveness of a
DSLR.
But, so far, the glass seems really, /really/ nice.
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/9152060941/
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/9152060027/
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
