On 05/09/2013, Tom C <caka...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 5 Sep 2013, at 18:22, Bob W <p...@web-options.com> wrote: >> >>> On 5 Sep 2013, at 16:17, Tom C <caka...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> I don't know... If you go to kodak.com and click into the site you >>>>> will >>>>> see that two of their three main goals are "disrupting product goods >>>>> packaging" and "disrupting functional printing" ???? WTF? I guess the >>>>> word "disrupting" means something different now than it did when I got >>>>> sent to the principals office for doing it. >>>>> >>>>> Mark >>>> >>>> That's pretty hilarious. I can see them wanting to disrupt, like >>>> shaking things up in the market, but that's still an odd choice of >>>> words. As you allude to, it has negative connotations as opposed to >>>> positive. >>> >>> Someone has mistranslated something. They probably mean disruptive. >>> >>> B >> >> In fact, i just looked and it (now) says disruptive. >> >> B > > Your point is... ? What's the basic difference in meaning between > disrupt, disrupting, and disruptive? They all mean the same thing to > me, except for how they fit into a sentence grammatically.
"distributing" would make more sense - not to mention profit. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
