For Pentax, I think KEH has the K7 within your specified price range.
On 9/7/2013 4:54 AM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
I am pretty sure I want interchangeable lenses, because I am now used to that. I only threw in the low light thing as a nod to Pentax. Not THAT important to me, but most newer cameras do light pretty well. Older ones less so. So I guess I am saying newer. Viewfinder or optical viewfinder. Yup. Image shake reduction or whatever that system calls it. Yup. But otherwise, like I said, I am OPEN. I really mean that, I want to be open too, which means exploring a lot of options. I am fine with that, no rush. Someone could mention something I really hadn't considered yet and that would make me think. Like Fujifilm. Hadnt thought of them. HTH, Marnie aka Doe :-) I also thought people might enjoy hearing what other people like, as well. In a message dated 9/6/2013 9:49:03 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, a...@pobox.com writes: Please be more precise about what you're looking for. For example, how much do you really need interchangeable lenses? I have the Canon G1X for low-light work (definitely not as good as the current-generation DSLR-likes, but better than any other non-ILC). I also like my Nikon P7100 and will likely upgrade to the P7800 for its better low-light perfomance. The G1X is 28-112mm/e and the P7100 is 28-200mm/e. Both have optical viewfinder, the P7800 has EVF. Several m4/3 cameras have EVF; if you like Pentax, you'd probably prefer Olympus because Panansonic has no built-in shake reduction except for the new and not yet available GX7.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
