>Those are both cool shots, Stan. > >KEH's "bargain" condition has almost always been considered an >overstatement (people very happy with what they get), but their >description of "ugly" (which includes fungus and other OPTICAL >problems) is REALLY off-putting. To find out that something can be >rated "ugly" and still only have cosmetic issues makes me think that >maybe it isn't as much a roll-of-the-dice as I had thought. At least >if it is one of those Sigmas that often look "ugly" because the finish >chips and scratches off BIG TIME. That would not be a big deal to me, >either. > >Glad you found a bargain!
KEH "ugly" is odd. I once got a Tokina 80-400 AF zoom for $25. Description said it wouldn't mount properly on a body. So I took a chance. The only problem was that the mount was bent in slightly. Just took a table knife to lift it back out flush and all was well. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
