> From: Rob Studdert <distudio.p...@gmail.com>

Hi Rob, Mark, Paul, et al,

Stan nicely elaborated on what I was trying to say last night. There's
absolutely nothing wrong with taking tons of shots to capture the
exact moment(s). With a dynamic moving subject that's clearly
desirable, if not a necessity.

I hope that was clear to all by my responses on the subject, and that
I was addressing the subject of getting good shots in a more generic
sense.

As Stan summed up, quality vs. quantity. And of course quantity if the
subject dictates.

Tom C.


>
> I shoot a lot of shows along side other photographers, sometimes I
> shoot more than them, sometimes less but generally the feedback I get
> from artists is complementary with relation to my ability to capture
> their most meaningful facial expressions. My images are sometimes
> technically better than others but all the technical stuff aside the
> absolute differentiator is timing, and sometimes you just need to
> shoot the hell out of a subject in order to capture the perfect
> expression. That said I rarely set my drive mode to continuous but the
> shutter still seems to become pretty rapid fire when the action
> demands.
>
> On 31 October 2013 10:50, Mark Roberts <postmas...@robertstech.com> wrote:
>> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>
>>>On Oct 30, 2013, at 4:37 PM, Mark Roberts <postmas...@robertstech.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> BTW: In the case of fashion photographers the answer to why they take
>>>> so many shots is often "because that's what the editors demand". Some
>>>> will totally decompensate if they don't have thousands of images, with
>>>> the slightest variation between any two, to choose from. If you're a
>>>> working pro you have to deliver what the client wants (unless you're
>>>> one of a handful of elites who can dictate to editors what you're
>>>> going to give them).
>>>
>>>To that add that trying to get a model to strike that perfect pose with the
>>>perfect expression is extremely difficult. So you have them try different
>>>things and you keep snapping away. You simply can't get it in a reasonable
>>>number of shots with most models.
>>
>> Yep. At the college where I teach we have a bi-annual student-produced
>> fashion magazine. On Tuesday at our Graphic Design club meeting were
>> going through possible cover photos. Probably a thousand of them. The
>> difference a small change in pose can make is astonishing.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
>> www.robertstech.com
*************

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to