I make my swords out of ploughshares. B
> On 2 Nov 2013, at 17:15, Boris Liberman <bori...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I can hardly see how a sword can be made from a lens filter... At best it can > be turned to a shuriken... > >> On 11/2/2013 7:09 PM, Bob W wrote: >>> On 2 Nov 2013, at 13:09, Godfrey DiGiorgi <godd...@me.com> wrote: >>> >>> [...]. I await the Mongol Horde of filter extremists and their flaming >>> swords ... Perhaps I'll offer them tea >> >> ...and a filter-tipped Camel >> >>> >>> Godfrey >>> >>> >>>> On Nov 2, 2013, at 4:00 AM, Eric Weir <eew...@bellsouth.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> Midway in my walk back in September I replaced the lens cap on the A >>>> 28/2.8 with a uv filter. Recently I thought I ordered 49 and 67 mm uv >>>> filters [Tiffen] for use as lens protectors on two other lenses. When the >>>> order arrived I had two 67 mm flyers, one uv, one uv haze. >>>> >>>> My first thought was to return the haze, but reading up a little I thought >>>> maybe I’d keep it. In a discussion of uv vs. uv haze on photo.net, >>>> however, I encountered a diversity of opinions about filter vs. no filter >>>> and uv vs. haze, and strongly negative opinions about Tiffen. >>>> >>>> I’d be interested in this group’s thoughts. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
