On 11/3/2013 9:42 PM, Bob W wrote:
My claim, and my years of experience back this up, is that for normal purposes nobody will be able to see the degradation without the type of equipment needed for conducting formal tests. Ergo for all intents and purposes, it does not exist and the filter does no harm. Nobody, in the 40 or so years I've been taking pictures, has ever looked at one of my photos and pointed out an image quality problem attributable to using a clear filter (other than internal reflections. Once), and I suspect it has never happened to anyone else either.
I couldn't agree more.
But I'm not going to get hung up on it and force my opinion on others. I'll simply have naysayers hanged, drawn and quartered instead.
Oh, just learned a word - "quartered" :-). Can the naysayer be split into eight pieces then?
Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
