Maybe I'm misusing the term meta-data.. if I save for web in
adobe photoshop 5.0 the camera data disappears. so perhaps camera data
is not "meta-data"
ann
On 1/23/2014 16:26, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 23, 2014, at 3:36 PM, Ann Sanfedele <ann...@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
OTOH - improving the quality there may lead to more photo swiping.
I send Facebook on jpgs at 72 ppi and no larger than 800 px across..
but I don't do "save for web" because that clobbers some meta-data.
ann
I do “save for web” on all my web-sized images. The only meta data lost is
informational specs as far as I know. To the best of my knowledge it doesn’t
affect the image. And you can dial in the parameters on “save for web” to give
you just the kind of jpeg compression and color space you want.
Paul
On 1/23/2014 14:57, Bruce Walker wrote:
Photoshelter posted a nice article on how to get around the terrible
quality-mangling compression artifacts that Facebook introduces when
you upload images there. Curiously, the easy answer is upload PNG
files! Very counterintuitive, but apparently it helps.
http://blog.photoshelter.com/2014/01/facebook-photos-look-bad-diy-solution-fix
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
