Seems reasonable to me.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
----- Original Message -----
From: "steve harley" <p...@paper-ape.com>
Subject: Re: K-3 and CS3 fail
on 2014-03-28 13:06 Ken Waller wrote
If you capture in DNG you shouldn't need to use the Adobe converter.
Is that written somewhere? ;+>
Tell that to my P S CS2. How could Adobe have known about a Ricoh K3 back
when
they released CS2. Conversely - should Ricoh have known about a DNG from
the K3
not being able to be converted by CS2?
as i understand it, DNG standardizes the description of camera's raw
output — both the raw Bayer array data and the information needed to
interpret it, and possibly also things like lens correction info — so that
a tool fully supporting DNG should be able to render (demosaic) the data
into a regular pixel array (an image where every pixel is in full color)
however, there continue to be newer versions of the DNG specification, so
old software may not be able to properly handle a DNG made by a newer
camera; in that sense, new software should be backward compatible - your
DNGs should continue to work in the future, which meets the archival goal
of the spec — but old software might not be forward compatible, that is
not a goal of the spec
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
