I agree. The Epson flatbeds are excellent. Paul via phone
> On Apr 1, 2014, at 7:35 PM, Paul <pentax1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'd have to vote for the V500 or its successor. Although we have a couple > Epson all in ones (a WF2530 and WF2540) which both do a decent job when all I > need is a quick and dirty scan. For serious scanning I'll fire up the V500. > > -p > >> On 4/1/2014 2:38 PM, P.J. Alling wrote: >> Probably the least expensive, that produces reasonable, (OK, you define >> reasonable but it seems so too me), output, is currently the Epson >> Perfection V550 which replaced the V500 at a slightly lower MSRP with >> slightly higher specifications. Figure he'll pay less than $150. + Tax >> and or Shipping so the damned thing is disposable once it's out of >> warranty. Which is pretty much the way you have to view anything these >> days. >> >>> On 4/1/2014 3:26 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote: >>> >>> Hi All! >>> >>> I remember seeing some discussion about photoscanners on the list not >>> too long ago, and so I thought some people wouldn't mind sharing their >>> thoughts again. >>> >>> My brother is considering buying one and asked me for my advise. >>> >From what I know, slide scanning is not important, it will be primarily >>> printed photos that will be scanned. >>> >>> Any suggestions as to what features/characteristics to look for and what >>> to avoid? >>> Any particular models? >>> >>> One of the models that he is considering is "Epson Perfection V37". >>> Any comments about it? >>> >>> Thank you! >>> >>> Igor > > -- > Being old doesn't seem so old now that I'm old. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
