If i go just prime on a walk,i usually take my DA F 50 f2.8 and the FA 100 f2.8 macro. Now that i have them dialed into my K-5 i get great results.
I have to say my recent Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4.0 is also working out quite well. Dave On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Daniel J. Matyola <danmaty...@gmail.com> wrote: > OK, if I do acquire a "new to me" K-5II or IIs, I should get a good > fixed focal length lens to go with it. Currently, I use the 18-135 > zoom, the 100mm f2.8 macro and the DA 50mm f1.8 with my K-r. > > I was looking at the 21mm f3.2 DA AL Limited, the 35mm f2.8 macro > limited and the 40mm f2.8 DA limited. Which have people here found > the most useful and versatile? Which (if any) do you prefer for image > quality? > > I am concerned that the 40 might be too close to the 50 I use now. Is > it significantly better in image quality? > > I have the 100 macro; will the 35 macro allow me to do things I can't > with the 100? I know the 35 limited is a lot more modern, but I > really have no complaints about the 100 macro, aside from the shaky > hand behind the lens. > > Any thoughts and recommendations will be greatly appreciated. > > Dan Matyola > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Documenting Life in Rural Ontario. www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ York Region, Ontario, Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
