Paul Stenquist wrote: > All of the prints for this article were scanned on my Epson V500. And > it’s not even the top of the Epson line. Epson flatbeds are excellent. > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/79914167/That%20Kid%20From%20Chicag > o.pdf
Great article too, I love the 66/67 Charger in particular. Can the Epson deal with underexposed negatives or transparencies? I have a number I took in the late '70s (just before I bought my first Pentax) that have the detail there, but you need to compensate to bring the detail out. I expected to convert them to a digital image with a DSLR, simply because I could play about with exposure etc. I'd like to do as much as possible in camera/scanner before post-processing. Malcolm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
