The buyer of Lik's magnum opus may not be as dumb as you think. I would
be very surprised if there wasn't some kind of tax write-off scam
involved that more than paid back the purchase price.
On 2/23/2015 3:00 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
The art world is made up of people with more money than brains, or
taste, and the con-men who bilk them, It's an entire ecosystem from
produces of shit to purveyors of shit to consumers of shit. Lik has
found out how to get the consumers of shit to consume his with out the
help of the purveyor, that is what the art world finds distasteful about
Peter Lik, He may also be shit, but that's not the issue.
On 2/23/2015 2:42 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
The art world doesn't have a high opinion of Lik. They think he's
shit. And he is.
B
On 23 Feb 2015, at 18:41, John <sesso...@earthlink.net> wrote:
On 2/23/2015 3:16 AM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
Like Lik and Vettriano and others, you seem to misunderstand
fundamentally what matters to the art world. Rhine II is not supposed
to be representative of what was in front of the camera.
I understand exactly what matters to the "art world". I just don't share
their high opinion for Lik et al. It always brings me back to that Dire
Straits song "In the Gallery".
--
-
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
