Hi Mishka, I'm curious, I've only seen one poor comment on this lens (and that is on Stan's site), most people who have it really like it. Do you have a link to some of these other negative comments? What were some of the complaints?
William in Utah. Mishka wrote: > > Shel, > I appreciate the suggestion. But unfortunately for me, the only way to test > it is to buy it first. And they are not exactly cheap (I saw one today > somewhere advertived for $250 and that's the cheapest one I have seen yet). > So yes, you are right -- in an ideal world. > But thanks for the information: this lens does sound like the one I am > looking for, I was just put off by quite a few negative comments I read > about it. > Mishka > > > Here's a suggestion: instead of reading tests and what others have to > > say about this lens, or any piece of equipment, wrap your little fingers > > around the barrel and use it. Decide for yourself if it's suited to > > your needs. I've numerous 85mm lenses, and while the A*85/1.4 may be > > "better" than the K85/1.8, and the K85/1.8 "better" than the M85/2.0, > > they all have a place and a use, they each have their own unique > > characteristics. You have to decide what characteristics are most > > important. I'd be most reluctant to give up any of them. But if I had > > to give up one, it would not be the M85/2.0 > > -- > > Shel Belinkoff > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
