On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Alan C <c...@lantic.net> wrote: > Isn't it like a placebo? You need to justify the expenditure so you convince > yourself that it works.
I have no expenditure to justify, but I had no trouble seeing the difference. (Make sure your browser isn't shrinking the image to fit in your window!) For example, look at the 9 in "19 STRAND". The white gap between the upper part and the lower part of the 9 is better defined to me in the pixel-shift shot. I think the difference might be more significant at larger apertures; diffraction is in play at f/11, with an Airy disk diameter of ~14.7 µm, and a pixel size of 3.88 µm. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
