That should be "your display", damned f!&@$#n' spell checker, you'd
think by now that I'd have learned to watch how it corrects suspect words...
On 10/23/2015 1:54 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
Probably you're display can't actually show the differences. I don't
see any differences either. I know that the display I'm using isn't
nearly as good as the Hitachi SuperScan CRT that it replaced.
On 10/23/2015 12:01 AM, Alan C wrote:
Am I missing something? Can't see a difference.
Alan C
-----Original Message----- From: Darren Addy
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:04 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm
Limited atf/11
My K-3II arrived today and so I had to try out the Pixel Shift
Resolution during afternoon break. Found an obliging dusty rack of
electrical wire that agreed to serve as my subject. The 77mm f/1.8
limited is a very sharp lens (as anyone who has one will tell you).
What you see in the link below is an image blown up to 100% (actual
pixels). Each is an 863 pixel x 994 pixel crop of the full 6016 x 4000
pixel image.
Conditions: Same exposure (2 sec. f/11, ISO 100) focused manually,
shutter fired with the 12 second self-timer. The only thing that
changed between shots was that I turned on Pixel Shift Resolution
(without moving anything). On the left is a standard out of camera
JPEG and on the right the JPEG produced with Pixel Shift Resolution.
Click on it with your browser cursor to see it at 100%:
http://www.antiqueauto.org/assets/PSRComparison.jpg
At least for cooperative subjects, it looks (to me) like all my lenses
just magically got significantly better.
--
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve
immortality through not dying.
-- Woody Allen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
