And yet you're watching...

LOL!

Perhaps I'll see if I have any photos to post. But last weekend was so
dismal in the photography department...

cheers,

frank


On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Darren Addy <pixelsmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A thread like this is the conversational equivalent of everyone
> marching in wearing their overshoes and opening their raincoats to
> reveal that they are wearing nothing underneath. It's not a pretty
> sight.
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:57 PM, knarf <knarftheria...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> "They called themselves Communists."
>>
>> The former East Germany called themselves the German Democratic Republic. 
>> What's in a name?
>>
>> "Lenin was the orthodox Marxist."
>>
>> At the risk of oversimplification, Lenin was about the Party, and 
>> centralizing power. I suspect he may have considered that a necessary 
>> interim measure but he did that. There's a reason they called it 
>> "Marxist-Leninist"; he changed marxism .
>>
>> "Mao was an orthodox Marxist."
>>
>> He was just an evil totalitarian dictator. He used Marxist-Leninist jargon 
>> and catch words but he was basically a Stalinist.
>>
>> "Stalin maintained Lenin's system."
>>
>> See Mao. I mean, he basically wrested power from Lenin (Trotsky was the heir 
>> apparent) and turned the USSR into a full-on State-Capitalist economy. He 
>> was an evil dictator. He was all about power. He turned himself into a god, 
>> a cult leader to be worshipped and adored. There was nothing of a communist 
>> about him.
>>
>> Look, I said earlier that there's never been a communist state. And I don't 
>> think there ever will be one. I think that one of the downfalls (perhaps the 
>> biggest one) of communism is that it almost necessarily devolves into a 
>> dictatorship, with a single-party, totalitarian government led by a 
>> megalomaniac who tries to turn himself into a god.
>>
>> It's happened enough times, hasn't it?
>>
>> I'm a lefty but I'm no commie. Nice concept, nice theory but it'll never 
>> fly. The vacuum left during or after the revolution will always leave the 
>> opening for the above to occur. Always.
>>
>> But whatever criticisms you have of the evil regimes you mention, they're 
>> evil for reasons other than their putative communism.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> frank
>>
>>
>>
>> On November 17, 2015 2:50:01 PM EST, Collin B <coll...@brendemuehl.net> 
>> wrote:
>>>>There has never been a communist state. After the Revolution the USSR
>>>may
>>>have been moving that way but never got there. However close they may
>>>(or
>>>may not have) come,
>>>>they were completely derailed by Stalin.
>>>>
>>>>The USSR and every other so-called communist state were actually
>>>State-Capitalists. That is they were in fact capitalist however the
>>>means of
>>>production were owned by
>>>>the state rather than individuals or corporations (who are, as we all
>>>know,
>>>legal persons).
>>>>
>>>>So whatever happened to the USSR and the Warsaw Pact states, it wasn't
>>>happening to commies.
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>
>>>>frank
>>>
>>>In the West we like to over-simplify or idealize communism as some sort
>>>of
>>>communalism.
>>>Nothing could be further from the truth, John Lennon not being excused
>>>for
>>>his "imagination."
>>>
>>>They called themselves Communists.  Lenin was the orthodox Marxist.
>>>Mao was an orthodox Marxist.  Stalin maintained Lenin's system.
>>>Stalin killed 60M.  Mao, at least 30M.  Hitler, 10M+
>>>Those three killed about 1/20 of the world population of the mid 20th
>>>c.
>>>Communism is about power.  It was never about a touchy-feely community.
>>>
>>>Reading Marx' "Capital" he did not entirely oppose the existence of
>>>capital
>>>but the system under which it was managed.
>>>
>>>
>>>We just don't learn from history.  Malthus was foundational to Marx.
>>>Though his predictions have failed on numerous occasions they are still
>>>being proposed as workable (eg, Sanger & the modern green movement).
>>>Lenin just couldn't make things work.  (To his credit, though, he did
>>>clamp
>>>down on organized crime.)
>>>Look at PROC & Cuba? They survive because the feed off capitalism, just
>>>as
>>>do other forms of socialism.
>>>N. Korea, on the other hand, presents the world something much closer
>>>to
>>>Stalin's USSR.
>>
>> --
>>
>> "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -- Henri Cartier-Bresson
>>
>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>
>
>
> --
> Life is too short to put up with bad bokeh.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.



-- 
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."  -Henri Cartier-Bresson

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to