P.J.,
Steve made a good point that the Dell monitor has only VGA (and HDMI)
connector.
http://www1.la.dell.com/vc/en/corp/peripherals/dell-se2416h-monitor/pd.aspx?refid=dell-se2416h-monitor&s=corp
While HDMI is digital, from experience, I am thinking that DVI is more
convenient. (HDMI had some limitations, if I remember correctly.)
In any case, - if you'd be considering a high-resoltion 27" monitor,
before buying it, make sure your video-card supports that resolution.
AFAIK, some 2560x1440 (especially the cheaper ones) do not support
lower resolution modes at all.
Igor
steve harley Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:38:17 -0800 wrote:
On 2015-12-16 16:04 , P.J. Alling wrote:
with DVI & HDMI i'd say that's a better choice; you are looking at the
low-end of flat panel displays, but that's still probably pretty good by
the standards of a few years ago; both of these displays have a stand that
only tilts, which i would find frustrating; the Acer also has faster
refresh and a cleaner design (thin bezel) so between the two i'd say it
wins
but if you can afford it, i would suggest at least a 27" monitor . not one
of the really cheap 1920x1080 models, but 2560x1440 . because the extra
pixels make a big difference with photography
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
