Since march, I kind of slip a comment here and there without having presented myself until now. (My english is kind of slippery too.) I live in Quebec City. I've been on Pentax since '83.
I began with my father's Contaflex some years before and found myself, a young anthropology student, travelling with 2 Canonets in '82 when I met a hometown guy who recommended an MX as an eventual SLR, a small impressive camera, he could have said. From there my mind was set on this one. While in southern Mexico (good to feel warm weather in january...), a sudden currency devaluation cut all prices in two (for us). So I could afford the 2 most common non-normal M lenses (28mm & 135mm) - found in a small town ! - knowing I would get a MX body as soon as possible. I went to New York at spring time to see museums and get a cheap MX. Prices were in display so I first went into that store where the price was the lowest and told the seller that I noted his price on the MX was surprisingly low. The guy went mad (thought I was implying something unclear about his merchandise) and almost kicked my ass to immediately get me out of his store. Welcome New York ! (Paris is almost as bad... not Len of course). I finally got a body for 130$ if I remember well. Found a new old stock M 50/1.4 in Quebec and I was set for a love story that would last and last until now... Who's got the time to read all that? I'll go faster and drop the romantic part. As I found SMC Takumar cheaper and easier to get, I switched to these and eventually acquired a bunch of them but in real nomadic life used most of the time a 28mm, a 55mm and a 100mm macro (the best lens I've ever had). Put on MXs, Spotmatics or a combination of both (always 2 bodies: chrome + B&W). Today I do it with LXs and K lenses if in town (classic progression of focals: 24mm, 35mm, 50-55mm, 85m, 135mm, 200mm, 300mm) or M lenses if travelling ("steeper" progression: 28, 50, 100 mac, 200 ; thinking about trying super-lite hiking kit 20, 40, 85 + K6-2X + achromatic close-up lens + reverse ring + AF-200T off body + reflector, table tripod). I'm not a professionnal photographer. I've taken mostly Kodachrome and Kodak B&W and mostly while travelling (Latin America). I'm beginning to feed some to a Coolscan & print on an Epson 1200 with MIS inks and... (I feel wiziwiged...) I'm very very far from some Cibachromes I did one day. For the last three years I did mostly portraits of local live musicians on Tri-X. Having collected much documentation on Pentax stuff, I was able to collaborate with Boz for some time. I've read good parts of the Pentax (old) archives (I'd like so much to have a copy of it...) but stopped reading a year ago being too busy with depression. (I'm back on my feet, cameras on my back.) I have a good "superficial" knowledge of Pentax manual focus era equipment (not Asahiflex though) but would like to identify better the optical character of Asahi lenses I meet. I plan to do some real-life matches between a number of lenses (taking the same photo with 2 or more lenses, in a row). Bokeh is important to me, also color balance, contrast & flare resistance and vignetting. I still don't know how to put JPEGs on the WEB to show some results... what a shame... For example, I compared an old Takumar 200/3.5 (I read that in the sixties, some Nikoners of that era had this lens modified to fit their F cameras because it was faster than Nikon's) with Pentax-M 200/4. I scan the slides at 2700dpi with color stable Coolscan (6 multi-pass with Vuescan) and check details. Have Pentax done better with the M lens, 20 years later ? I'd say yes and no... Optical performance (drawn from ONE "light" situation, one f-stop ; no bokeh comparison, no low-contrast shot or flare-prone situation etc.) is practically the same BUT! ...M-lens is much smaller and lighter. In a corner, I could see the M lens does have a little bit more contrast, maybe because of lower internal reflections due to SMC, I don't know. Color balance is identical. Some of you will laugh at this exercice. I do take photos mostly for fun and don't care about the optical character of a lens when i use it. But I think I might find something comparing lenses in real-life situations. I don't know what. Maybe nothing. Wow... that would be something! Andre - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .