> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bruce Dayton > > > Tom, > > When choosing between 645n and 67II, I got the feeling that if I had > gone the 645 route, I would probably shoot more frames like I do in > 35mm because of the speed of winding, AF and more frames > per roll. Do > you think if you were shooting the 67 that you would still "blast > away" or slow it down a bit?
I guess I'd have to slow down a bit to change film and wind on, but otherwise, no, I'd still blast away. I certainly understand the inclination to take your time with each shot, and to a certain extent it's the same case with the 645n. However, I fight this inclination when I feel it creeping up - I don't want to shoot that way all the time. I like to try and keep my photography loose and spontaneous. In other words, I don't feel that slowing down makes my photographs any better. tv - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
