I'm not sure if Ektachrome 64 is still available. But you're right: it had a distinctive blue cast. Ektachrome 100S is totally different. And if you want a slight warm cast, Ektachrome 100WS provides a bit of that. It makes it look like everything was shot an hour before sunset, which can be good if everything isn't being shot an hour before sunset:-). But I like all of the new Ektachrome 100 variants. The 100VS provides high saturation, but not as pronounced (dare I say garish) as Velvia. Like Velvia, it's more difficult to scan than the 100S. Here's a scan from Ektachrome 100VS: http://home.earthlink.net/~pnstenquist/_uimages/55chevy.jpg
Cotty wrote: > > >> > I have yet to put a roll of transparency film through - what > >> > would be good for landscapes on MF? > >> > >Ektachrome 100S produces excellent images with saturated but believable > >color. And it scans very well. > > Thanks Paul. In 1981 I remember using Ektachrome 64 on an RB67 and being > pretty impressed with it, but did it give a bluie cast or was I dreaming? > Is it still available? Or has it been superseded by the 100? > > Cotty > > _______________________________________________________ > Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Check out the UK Macintosh ads > http://www.macads.co.uk > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
